up: removes validation to allow your custom one

README.md

@@ -347,6 +347,19 @@ rating:
 Now the rates will be written on `reviews` table over `rating_rates` and calculation will be on `review_ratings` over `rating_ratings`.
 You can change one table o both of them.
 
+
+## Validation
+
+It is recommended that you add a validation to ensure that the author do not vote multiple times on the same resource and its scope.
+This validation is not inside the gem since you could want make your own custom validation.
+
+```ruby
+validates :author_id, uniqueness: {
+  case_sensitive: false,
+  scope:          %i[author_type resource_id resource_type scopeable_id scopeable_type]
+}
+```
+
 ## Love it!
 
 Via [PayPal](https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=X8HEP2878NDEG&item_name=rating) or [Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/wbotelhos). Thanks! (:

lib/rating/models/rating/rate.rb

@@ -14,11 +14,6 @@ module Rating
     validates :author, :resource, :value, presence: true
     validates :value, numericality: { greater_than_or_equal_to: 1, less_than_or_equal_to: 100 }
 
-    validates :author_id, uniqueness: {
-      case_sensitive: false,
-      scope:          %i[author_type resource_id resource_type scopeable_id scopeable_type]
-    }
-
     def self.create(author:, metadata:, resource:, scopeable: nil, value:)
       record = find_or_initialize_by(author: author, resource: resource, scopeable: scopeable)
 

spec/models/rate_spec.rb

@@ -18,10 +18,4 @@ RSpec.describe Rating::Rate do
   it do
     is_expected.to validate_numericality_of(:value).is_less_than_or_equal_to(100).is_less_than_or_equal_to 100
   end
-
-  it do
-    expect(object).to validate_uniqueness_of(:author_id)
-      .scoped_to(%i[author_type resource_id resource_type scopeable_id scopeable_type])
-      .case_insensitive
-  end
 end